Growth efficiency
Check how well your tech startup balances growth against profit, and how much cash you burn for each pound of new annual recurring revenue.
| Burn multiple | Rating | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Below 1 | Amazing | Less than £1 burned per £1 of new ARR |
| 1 to 1.5 | Great | £1 to £1.50 burned per £1 of new ARR |
| 1.5 to 2 | Good | £1.50 to £2 burned per £1 of new ARR |
| 2 to 3 | Suspect | Growth is getting expensive |
| Above 3 | Bad | Burning heavily for each pound of growth |
Bands follow David Sacks’ rule of thumb for burn multiple. Rule of 40: a score of 40 or more is commonly seen as strong for software businesses at scale. These are rules of thumb, not targets.
Net new ARR fills in from your two ARR figures. Change it if you track it differently, for example to strip out one-off or non-recurring revenue. Use the same margin definition each time you check (EBITDA margin and cash flow margin are both common).
Benchmarks: burn multiple bands follow David Sacks’ rule of thumb. The Rule of 40 is usually applied to software businesses past roughly £1m to £5m ARR; earlier on, growth rate tends to matter more. In this tool, 40 or more shows as strong, 20 to 40 as below the line, and under 20 as weak. Nothing you type leaves your browser.
Techcelerate members work through results like these together in Execution Sprints, with tech founders who have built, failed and exited.